On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 10:24 -0400, Robert Casto wrote: > I very much like where this thread is headed. > > Having viable options with Java that Oracle can not touch sounds like > a win for the community. There is a lot of value in those libraries > that can be leveraged by a developer. That makes them productive and > of benefit to a company. If all we have to do is change the underlying > VM to something that is safe from Oracle, then so be it. I'm sure that > VM would get a lot more attention from the community to make it great > for production use.
Perhaps the JVM could then support type parameters and the abomination that is type erasure could be dispensed with. -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:[email protected] 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: [email protected] London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
