Wasn't this pretty much the goal of SWT? On 2 September 2010 11:56, Carl Jokl <[email protected]> wrote:
> In the case of AWT. This has stuck to the lowest common denominator of > all supported platforms. Do you think it would be workable to have > some native implementations of features which were lacking in one or > another client platform as part of the Java installation to help > create a richer set of common supported features? I suppose Swing is > the more extreme case of just not bothering using any native > components. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > > -- Kevin Wright mail/google talk: [email protected] wave: [email protected] pulse: kev.lee.wright skype: kev.lee.wright twitter: @thecoda -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
