On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Robert Casto <[email protected]> wrote: > Some people think the scanners are immodest or a complete invasion of > privacy. The courts have not decided on that. People have their own beliefs, > so if they feel so strongly against it, they should not fly. Flying is not > mandatory. It is just the fastest way to get from one place to another. I > think it is better than a complete body pat-down which is the alternative. I > really don't like having to do either but the public wants safe airlines so > there you go.
Again, you are arguing from the positions that these are actually effective. Worse, you are now saying that there is a reasonable alternative, so people should just deal. I mean, why would people care that they have to ride at the back of the bus? They still get to ride and, really, if they dislike moving to the back so much, they could just walk or buy a car. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
