> > - There's an official Git SCM provider at Eclipse, and Eclipse offers > Git hosting to its projects, too. The CVS integration in Eclipse was > very good - in part, I believe, because Eclipse used CVS itself. >
There is two for Mercurial and one of them at least is working quite fine (sorry, don't have the links handy) > - Github is a pretty popular place to host and collaborate code. > bitbucket, recently buyout by Atlassian, has nothing to envy from github > - If you ever venture into Uncle Steve's wonderful but walled world, > then you'll find that Xcode 4 (in beta since last June) will support > Git, too. > Hg is also very easy to install and use on Mac OS X Again, there is NO definite argument between those two, the reason to choose git over hg (or the otherway around) are generally mostly about the "developer's cutlure" or the "technological background". It's also funny to note that one year ago, using git was deemed impossible because way too "geeky", but since git has aquired momentum, its geekyness seems to have "disappear" (well, grant git's community has made a lot of effort to make more friendly, but it remains more difficult to handle than hg - but, again, more powerful). I uses both, and both are great, but I would hate to see somebody pick git over hg, just because git recent momentum give the impression it's a better solution... -- Romain PELISSE, *"The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it" -- Terry Pratchett* http://belaran.eu/wordpress/belaran -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
