On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 11:57 +0200, Jan Goyvaerts wrote: > A pity it's presented as yet again the deliver-later-but-better routine. At > the third time, the credibility of such a statement is a bit low really...
I agree the whole thing has been handled not as well as it should have been. The problems with the timetable were actually apparent six months ago, and marketing, planning and management action should have been taken then. > Not everybody in here is up to par to fix bugs in a JDK. (I'm one of > those). But I think there are a lot of other valid ways to contribute. I > for one log bugs on the products and libraries I use daily. Very > occasionally I can fix code. Getting bug reports in is a needed contribution, agreed. I am only just getting back into the habit after the outrageous treatment of a bug report in 2003. -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:[email protected] 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: [email protected] London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
