On 2002.02.28 14:10:32 -0500 marc fleury wrote: > |native libraries as in native.dll or libnative.so are only deployed if > they > |are found inside a jar-format package that is being unpacked. > > Yes, ok, I think this is one of the most interesting features proposed by > Jason in the very beginning. I was looking at this deal where the > management layers were written in Java or .NET. People really didn't see > the advantage of the J2EE solution and were pushing .NET like crazy > (cause > the cheap indian dev there were using knew microsoft tools better). My > read > of the situation was "j2ee might lose there" and the need for a "silver > bullet" solution like this one (management layer in Java, native libs in > whatever) became more and more apparent. no one can match this. > > I know we can download stuff to the machines today, but do we really take > care of the installation of native libs correctly? in the right place? > how > does this work? I am really ignorant of the way native libraries are > installed on target systems. We can take care of everything else though > :) > My experience with native libraries is limited, thankfully. The one I have to experiment with appears to load ok with the current code. I hope someone else who knows more and has some will find out if anything needs improvement.
david jencks > marcf > > > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
