give me some time to reach that decision, I will take it.

If jason can deliver on the point 1 scott made and we have the other stuff
the decision is going to be very simple.

For RC1 I promise we will have solved this.

I want to finish client interceptors by monday, before I take off for london

marcf

|-----Original Message-----
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason
|Dillon
|Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 6:32 PM
|To: Bill Burke
|Cc: Sacha Labourey; marc fleury; Andreas Schaefer; Scott M Stark;
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Fw: [JBoss-user] Multiple JBOSS 3.0 developers
|and clustering
|
|
|Why not setup up an example (or some other name) configuration and put
|the stuff that shouldn't be in default there?  This will keep things
|simple (small number of configs to maintain in the release dist).  I
|would expect that most first time users will want to see the basics (aka
|default config), then once they get a handle on the greatness of JBoss
|they will want to roll there own configuration.
|
|--jason
|
|
|Bill Burke wrote:
|
|>Somebody make a decision, and I'll do it.  But I agree clustering
|should not
|>be in the default configuration.
|>
|>>-----Original Message-----
|>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sacha
|>>Labourey
|>>Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 3:12 AM
|>>To: marc fleury; Andreas Schaefer; Scott M Stark;
|>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|>>Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Fw: [JBoss-user] Multiple JBOSS 3.0 developers
|>>and clustering
|>>
|>>
|>>Hello,
|>>
|>>I also think that clustering shouldn't be deployed by default.
|>>Nevertheless,
|>>the problem was to have, in the official distribution, a place
|>>where to put
|>>optional service.xml, sar, ... so that any user can pick one and
|>>deploy it.
|>>In the first alpha, cluster-service.xml wasn't present in the
|distribution
|>>and this was a problem for users just downloading the dist. Which
|>>is why it
|>>was put in deploy.
|>>
|>>Either we can make a specific config folder for clustering (as Marc
|>>suggests) or, at least, we provide a "plugins" or "optional"
|package where
|>>we can put xml/xAR that shouldn't be deployed by default.
|>>
|>>Cheers,
|>>
|>>
|>>                             Sacha
|>>
|>>
|>>>-----Message d'origine-----
|>>>De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|>>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de marc
|>>>fleury
|>>>Envoyé : jeudi, 28 février 2002 10:31
|>>>À : Andreas Schaefer; Scott M Stark;
|>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|>>>Objet : RE: [JBoss-dev] Fw: [JBoss-user] Multiple JBOSS 3.0 developers
|>>>and clustering
|>>>
|>>>
|>>>which brings us to the configuration story going around the list for the
|>>>past month or so...
|>>>
|>>>oka, I will just do a summary since I haven't really sat down
|>>>
|>>and thought,
|>>
|>>>just sat here on my ass going "nonono" at Jason and David on the "all in
|>>>deploy" proposal.
|>>>
|>>>OK
|>>>
|>>>What I don't like, really, is the SAR format. Having the files in
|>>>there is a
|>>>pain in the ass, there is no way to get at the configuration
|>>>simply.  End of
|>>>story. It is the same nightmare with the JAR in EJB, dumb
|>>>
|>>packaging.  Sure
|>>
|>>>packaging is nice in some cases (I drop everything) but really having to
|>>>open the SAR is just too big pain, a bigger pain than the nice
|>>>stuff, in my
|>>>mind the tradeoff is clear.  SAR no, *service.xml yes.
|>>>
|>>>Don't go apeshit on me now, we will still support the SAR, and
|>>>even provide
|>>>one of them in the default config, but we should NOT make it
|>>>
|>>pervasive in
|>>
|>>>our distributions.
|>>>
|>>>The classes should go under a "classes" directory (today
|>>>/lib/ext/) which is
|>>>centralized and will make central downloading of files simple.
|>>>
|>>>Then the question was "multiple service.xml vs one service.xml".  I am
|>>>actually thinking that David was right on that one.  It is nice
|>>>
|>>to remove
|>>
|>>>just the service.xml file from a given config.  The only problem is that
|>>>once the file is removed you need a copy of it to make it work again (as
|>>>opposed to comments in the configuration, but I *kinda* like the idea of
|>>>looking at a "deploy" directory and seeing all the files there
|>>>and each one
|>>>represents a my-name-that-means-something-service.xml and the
|>>>admin gets an
|>>>idea about what is deployed.  So David, please accept my
|>>>apologies, the dumb
|>>>idea is the "SAR" stuff not the breaking, breaking is ok.
|>>>
|>>>The final idea floating around is that of multiple configurations.  I am
|>>>thinking that there are many deploy directories in the
|>>>MainDeployer now (it
|>>>is capable of scanning many directories not just the /deploy one) and we
|>>>should take advantage of this.  Maybe we could have
|>>>/conf/default/<bare>-service.xml
|>>>/conf/medium/<more>-service.xml
|>>>/conf/nineyards/<everything>-service.xml
|>>>
|>>>like we have today but *watched* by the main deployer.
|>>>
|>>>I think it is pretty close to a proposal that was already out.
|>>>
|>>>And that is pretty much it imho.  If you want to add something do it...
|>>>
|>>>marcf
|>>>
|>>>PS: so in the case below it would mean
|>>>
|>>>the clustering classes are in lib/ext (or /classes/) as is today,
|>>>forget SAR
|>>>by default.
|>>>in conf/default we have a breakdown of bla-bla-service.xml that
|>>>
|>>get picked
|>>
|>>>up by the auto-deployer on first run (boot), this David can (and maybe
|>>>should) be as broken down as possible.  Removing a service does mean
|>>>removing the file.
|>>>
|>>>in conf/clustering/ we copy the configuration and we add the
|>>>clustering-service.xml file that contains the configuration for
|>>>
|>>this guy.
|>>
|>>>voila.  Running it says sh run.sh clustering
|>>>
|>>>something like that
|>>>
|>>>
|>>>
|>>>
|>>>|-----Original Message-----
|>>>|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|>>>|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
|>>>|Andreas Schaefer
|>>>|Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 9:57 PM
|>>>|To: Scott M Stark; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|>>>|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Fw: [JBoss-user] Multiple JBOSS 3.0 developers
|>>>|and clustering
|>>>|
|>>>|
|>>>|Hi
|>>>|
|>>>|If you running a laptop without the network card and therefore
|>>>|network services are down the start of the cluster will hang
|>>>|JBoss forever.
|>>>|
|>>>|I think clustering should not be part of the default configuration
|>>>|because it should used on purpose (for distribution).
|>>>|On the other hand maybe clustering should be part of CVS to
|>>>|let it run as a test.
|>>>|
|>>>|Andy
|>>>|
|>>>|----- Original Message -----
|>>>|From: "Scott M Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|>>>|To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|>>>|Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 9:36 PM
|>>>|Subject: [JBoss-dev] Fw: [JBoss-user] Multiple JBOSS 3.0 developers and
|>>>|clustering
|>>>|
|>>>|
|>>>|> This is a good comment. Should clustering really be enabled
|>>>|> as part of the default configuration?
|>>>|>
|>>>|> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|>>>|> Scott Stark
|>>>|> Chief Technology Officer
|>>>|> JBoss Group, LLC
|>>>|> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|>>>|> ----- Original Message -----
|>>>|> From: "Stephen Coy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|>>>|> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|>>>|> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 7:38 PM
|>>>|> Subject: [JBoss-user] Multiple JBOSS 3.0 developers and clustering
|>>>|>
|>>>|>
|>>>|> > Hi,
|>>>|> >
|>>>|> > We have found that if you have multiple developers on the
|>>>same network
|>>>|> > trying to run the 3.0 beta or later at the same time, the default
|>>>|> > configuration causes them to try and cluster with each other
|>>>(I think).
|>>>|> >
|>>>|> > Anyway, removing the "cluster-service.xml" file from the deploy
|>>>|> > directory certainly fixes the problem.
|>>>|> >
|>>>|> > To be more specific, jboss startup would hang while trying
|>>>
|>>to deploy
|>>
|>>>|> > cluster-service.xml if someone else already has one running.
|>>>|> >
|>>>|> > Steve Coy
|>>>|> > Whitesmiths Australia
|>>>
|>>
|>>_______________________________________________
|>>Jboss-development mailing list
|>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
|>>
|>
|>
|>_______________________________________________
|>Jboss-development mailing list
|>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
|>
|
|
|
|_______________________________________________
|Jboss-development mailing list
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Reply via email to