On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 09:26 +0000, Richard Dobson wrote: > Daniel Noll wrote: > > On Thursday 08 February 2007 00:14, Norman Rasmussen wrote: > > > >> True, how very unfortunate. You can't host a muc using a bot (or can > >> you? - probably depends on the server) > >> > > > > Maybe you can. If the server's behaving itself, it should let MUC requests > > slip through to an ordinary user. A normal client wouldn't support it but > > maybe a bot could be crafted to behave exactly like a MUC room? > > > > Daniel > > > How? How is the bot going to be able to create all of the extra > resources required on all servers consistently without having to make > multiple connections? Plus, how is that bot going to host multiple games > at once? I cant see how it can.
Instead, I would opt for using a vanilla MUC service and write a bot that owns the room. That should allow plenty control. -- Groetjes, ralphm
