Re: Connection Pooling in Turbine -> J2EE

[Jon Stevens]

on 2/6/01 12:34 AM, "ingo schuster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Be it as it may, we (at IBM) are committed to JSPs and we'll therefore take
> care that JSP will always be a good alternative to Velocity in Jetspeed.
> I have to admit that I'm still learning about how templating is supposed to
> be used with turbine and that our JSPs are not 100% code free, but I'm
> working to gradually improve it. ;-)
> 
> ingo.

How about this hypothesis based on your comments above:

If the people at IBM knew more about template tools like Velocity, they
wouldn't use JSP.

:-)

-jon

-- 
If you come from a Perl or PHP background, JSP is a way to take
your pain to new levels. --Anonymous
<http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/> | <http://java.apache.org/turbine/>



--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/jetspeed@list.working-dogs.com/>
List Help?:          [EMAIL PROTECTED]