radish;274868 Wrote: 
> I'm also not concerned with closed stuff (like firmware, SN) or
> sequence, but with exclusion.

There is the ability to allow access to those on cc'list, which would
make you included in dupes.  It may be an oversight in some cases, but
it others there is more information already in place on a bug that
simply can't be wide open at that time. It's an unfortunate trade off,
which always comes down to bugzilla being primarily a qc and developer
tool.  It is as open as possible, but when it can't be, then yes you
have to simply trust that those working on it are doing what can be
done.  It is still always possible to comment on bugs that are resolved
as dupes; the bugs are always linked.

If that answers the query, then we can end the digression.  If not,
perhaps it warrants a new thread on the dev list for ideas on how to
deal with private info vs open access.

-kdf


-- 
kdf
------------------------------------------------------------------------
kdf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=44061

_______________________________________________
jive mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jive

Reply via email to