On 2005-04-26 (13:01) Bob Hanson wrote: >super. I've put these up at > >http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr/jmol/applet/mscalc/jmolcalls. >html > >and > >http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr/jmol/docs/examples/jmolcalls. >html > >for people to compare. >
curious: these appear to be exact duplicates of my original page. so now we have the same code in three locations. can you clarify what you are trying to test here? thanks, tim -- Timothy Driscoll molvisions - see, grasp, learn. <http://www.molvisions.com/> usa:north carolina:raleigh >timothy driscoll wrote: > >>I've posted a very simple test for accessing the JmolApplet. it >>does >away with almost all complexity that can cloud this issue. you can >see it here: >> >><http://dev.molvisions.com/debugging/jmolcalls.html> >> >>it includes three methods: >> >>1. getElementById 2. document.appletname 3. document.applets[] >> >>so far, all three methods work for me in OSX: Safari 1.3, FF 1, Moz >1.7.3; also in IE6 (winXP). >> >> >>a few oddities: >> >>1. the messagecallback is somewhat inconsistent in its output. >>that >may have to do with the way I implemented it. it does not seem to >adversely affect the command stream, though. >> >>2. I developed this on my localhost server, and it worked without >flaw. then I copied it to my LAN www server and, without quitting >my browser, tried it out. it failed with all sorts of security >exceptions. I cleared my browser cache, quit and restarted, and now >it works fine. >> >> >>oddity 2 may point to the issue of accessing different Jmol pages, >>IOW >different JmolApplets, and somehow confusing the browser or the JVM. >but it does not point to a problem with actually sending scripts to >the JmolApplet. we should spawn a new thread for discussing the >cross-page problems, IMO. >> >> >>one final note: method 2 above: >> >>document.appletname >> >>must account for the DOM of the page. IOW, if I put my applet >>inside >a form named myform, for example, instead of directly under the body >tag, my call would have to change to >> >>document.myform.appletname >> >> >>the other two methods do not require this change. >> >> >> >>regards, >> >>tim > ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans! Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id5hix _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
