On 2005-04-26 (14:47) Bob Hanson wrote: >sure. sorry. Between the two we have two different JmolApplet.jar >files being used on the SAME site, and between them and your page we >have two different JmolApplet.jar files on two DIFFERENT sites. Same >file. > >All should do the same thing exactly.... Right? .... maybe not on >some Macs... depending upon how they are loaded. >
ok, now I understand. I will say with confidence that server does not seem to matter. I see failure with copies of JmolApplet on my server, but coming from different directories :-(. but I'm curious - has anyone tested the effect of renaming the applet jar file itself? I always use code="JmolApplet". I think this is a next step to take in narrowing down the problem... tim -- Timothy Driscoll molvisions - see, grasp, learn. <http://www.molvisions.com/> usa:north carolina:raleigh >timothy driscoll wrote: > >>On 2005-04-26 (13:01) Bob Hanson wrote: >> >> >>>super. I've put these up at >>> >>>http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr/jmol/applet/mscalc/jmolcalls. >html >>> >>>and >>> >>>http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr/jmol/docs/examples/jmolcalls. >html >>> >>>for people to compare. >>> >> >> >>curious: these appear to be exact duplicates of my original page. >>so >now we >>have the same code in three locations. can you clarify what you >>are >trying >>to test here? >> >> >>thanks, >> >>tim > "A computer lets you make more mistakes faster than any other invention, with the possible exceptions of handguns and Tequilla." - Mitch Ratcliffe ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans! Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id5hix _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
