. Since I believe in God and you don't, > > > you have made an incorrect assumption here. >
Then I suppose I misinterpret everything you say. > > > > Now where I get irritated is when you pass judgment on things > > which, I reiterate, you know nothing about. > > For example, in response to Sarah's book summary, all you can say > > to the idea that Jews are hated because they don't let themselves > > being victims anymore is "that's bollocks and absurd" . > > > I wrote that because that is how i feel. I know this is how you feel. it is absurd. And the comment > is much less harsh than the suggestion that we who do not agree with > everyhting you and Sarah write about Isreal are jew haters. PLease show me where I ever said or inferred anything like that? > not only do you make rash assumoptions, you also are very good at > avoiding the point. > Like how do you justify the killing for centuries based merely on an > idea? There is no justification for it whatsoever, amen. Seems to me the Christians win the early bird prize on this one (crusades, inquisition, etc) Sorry Vince, anyway it was good to hear from you; although I'd have to read Sarah's post again and the whole context to see whether she meant what you understood. Laurent Laurent
