The motives you attributed to Kakki were contained in your accusation that she continues "to interpret the views of people who dissent in such offensive terms . . . "

I believe she has replied that she has no such motive, and that she is sorry you see things that way, and that her words are not meant as attacks against anyone.

Pretty clear, I would say.

Sarah


At 5:42 PM -0800 02/15/2003, Kate Bennett wrote:
kakki>>
I have nothing left to explain any longer.  I'm sorry you attribute such
motives to what I have said - they are not meant against you or those who
dissent.  It seems that I am unable to clarify what I mean to some people's
satisfaction.  That makes me feel that nothing I can say will help
matters.<<

okay i'm more baffled than ever...what motives have i attributed to you?
here's the conversation:

kakki >>I don't want others to feel that everything and everyone in their
government is so evil.  I don't want them consumed with such negativity
every day.<<

kate's response>>what the h@#$ is the above sentence referring to? i
apologize for loosing my patience but i am baffled as to who the "others"
are that you are referring to- people here that have expressed their dissent
with our (usa) government?...no one here has used such elementary words to
explain their point of view & i am amazed that you continue to interpret the
views of people who dissent in such offensive terms...<<

Reply via email to