1A,  a key indicator SHOULD be included. (not a MUST)

On Apr 11, 2013, at 4:59 PM, Karen O'Donoghue <[email protected]> wrote:

> Issue #15 http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/15. suggests 
> requiring that a key indicator, such as a “kid” field, be required in all JWS 
> and JWE headers. Are use cases where key information is exchanged by means 
> other than the JWS or JWE headers important?
> Which of these best describes your preferences on this issue?
> 
> 1.  Yes.
> 
> 2.   No.
> 
> 0.  I need more information to decide.
> 
>  
> 
> Your reply is requested by Friday, April 19th (or earlier). 
> _______________________________________________
> jose mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose

_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose

Reply via email to