1. Yes - Use cases where key information is exchanged by means other than the JWS and JWE headers ARE important.
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Jones Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 8:25 AM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at least on key indicator be mandatory 1. Yes - Use cases where key information is exchanged by means other than the JWS and JWE headers ARE important. -----Original Message----- From: Roland Hedberg [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2013 1:33 AM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; Mike Jones Subject: Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at least on key indicator be mandatory I support 1 as defined by Mike. 12 apr 2013 kl. 07:25 skrev Mike Jones <[email protected]>: > 1. Yes - Use cases where key information is exchanged by means other than > the JWS and JWE headers ARE important -- Roland From: Mike Jones Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 10:25 PM To: '[email protected]'; [email protected] Subject: RE: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at least on key indicator be mandatory Reading this question, I believe that there's a possibility for the question to be misinterpreted, since the sense of the question in the subject is opposite of the sense of the question in the body. I believe that the intent of 1 and 2 were as follows: 1. Yes - Use cases where key information is exchanged by means other than the JWS and JWE headers ARE important. 2. No - Use cases where key information is exchanged by means other than the JWS and JWE headers ARE NOT important. Maybe people could reply with 1 and 2 as above, so that their answers to the question of whether these use cases are important are not are unambiguous. -- Mike From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Karen O'Donoghue Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 5:00 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at least on key indicator be mandatory Issue #15 http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/15. suggests requiring that a key indicator, such as a "kid" field, be required in all JWS and JWE headers. Are use cases where key information is exchanged by means other than the JWS or JWE headers important? Which of these best describes your preferences on this issue? 1. Yes. 2. No. 0. I need more information to decide. Your reply is requested by Friday, April 19th (or earlier). _______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose _______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
