If including a key indicator is not a MUST, then you have to specify what the receiver does when a key indicator is not present. Could you suggest text for that?
Thanks, --Richard On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Dick Hardt <[email protected]> wrote: > 1A, a key indicator SHOULD be included. (not a MUST) > > On Apr 11, 2013, at 4:59 PM, Karen O'Donoghue <[email protected]> wrote: > > Issue #15 http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/15. suggests > requiring that a key indicator, such as a “kid” field, be required in all > JWS and JWE headers.**** Are use cases where key information is exchanged > by means other than the JWS or JWE headers important? > > Which of these best describes your preferences on this issue?**** > > 1. Yes.**** > > 2. No. **** > > 0. I need more information to decide.**** > > > Your reply is requested by Friday, April 19th (or earlier). > _______________________________________________ > jose mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose > > > > _______________________________________________ > jose mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose > >
_______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
