On Jan 11, 2009, at 3:32 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:

From: Ralph Goers [mailto:[email protected]]

Has anyone from Jupiter contacted Apache about a problem? Based on the
research that has been done I don't see this as an obvious
infringement. If the project has been around for 4 years without
complaint I don't think it is worth the time and effort to worry about
things Juniper may or may not choose to do in the future.  If their
claim is on J-Security one could argue that that is not the same as
JSecurity anyway.

They don't claim J-Security as a trademark [1]. Further, they don't have any products with J-Security in the name. The only place I coud find it as the
name of their research lab.

I say register the trademark JSecurity, as a Java security framework and
move on.

Mark

[1] http://www.juniper.net/footerlegal.html#05

Here's a good point. I just did a search on http://www.uspto.gov/main/trademarks.htm .

There are no marks on J-Security or JSecurity. I would imagine that anyone who attempted to get that mark would be be too intimidated by all the other JSecurity usages out there.

I guess I'm starting to change my mind. In light of the fact that J- Security, or anyone else for that matter, never held a mark and so it prior use by them doesn't matter, would the other mentors reconsider their vote?


Regards,
Alan

Reply via email to