Hi Tony, well I do not demand a feature freeze. But my opinion is that we should have a more defined release cycle. I once had proposed 6 month dev cycle and 3 month stabilizing. Currently its pretty much unpredictable when 0.4 lands.
Cheers, Tobi Am Freitag, 23. Januar 2015 20:36:30 UTC+1 schrieb Tony Kelman: > > Rewriting the package manager to use libgit2 is another slow-progress one > that was targeted for 0.4, but maybe if folks are really demanding a > feature freeze then we could re-evaluate what goes in and when we're really > targeting to make 0.4-dev into 0.4-pre. > > New GC should get merged as soon as Oscar hits the button. > > > On Friday, January 23, 2015 at 5:25:35 AM UTC-8, Tim Holy wrote: >> >> On Friday, January 23, 2015 04:45:50 AM Tobias Knopp wrote: >> > The only thing that I really like to be in for 0.4 is >> > package precompilation. >> >> And we're 3/4 of the way there ( >> https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/8745). >> >> Uwe, that page doesn't do full justice to the current status. For >> example, >> #3988 is basically done, from what I can tell. Many (but not all) of the >> others have in-progress pull requests queued up, in various stages of >> being >> finished. But indeed there are cases where a few key decisions need to be >> made >> before further progress is possible; I'm sure you're right that the >> closing of >> #8839 will help. >> >> --Tim >> >>
