Tobias, that is exactly the plan. On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Tobias Knopp <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Tony, > > well I do not demand a feature freeze. But my opinion is that we should > have a more defined release cycle. I once had proposed 6 month dev cycle > and 3 month stabilizing. Currently its pretty much unpredictable when 0.4 > lands. > > Cheers, > > Tobi > > Am Freitag, 23. Januar 2015 20:36:30 UTC+1 schrieb Tony Kelman: > >> Rewriting the package manager to use libgit2 is another slow-progress one >> that was targeted for 0.4, but maybe if folks are really demanding a >> feature freeze then we could re-evaluate what goes in and when we're really >> targeting to make 0.4-dev into 0.4-pre. >> >> New GC should get merged as soon as Oscar hits the button. >> >> >> On Friday, January 23, 2015 at 5:25:35 AM UTC-8, Tim Holy wrote: >>> >>> On Friday, January 23, 2015 04:45:50 AM Tobias Knopp wrote: >>> > The only thing that I really like to be in for 0.4 is >>> > package precompilation. >>> >>> And we're 3/4 of the way there (https://github.com/JuliaLang/ >>> julia/pull/8745). >>> >>> Uwe, that page doesn't do full justice to the current status. For >>> example, >>> #3988 is basically done, from what I can tell. Many (but not all) of the >>> others have in-progress pull requests queued up, in various stages of >>> being >>> finished. But indeed there are cases where a few key decisions need to >>> be made >>> before further progress is possible; I'm sure you're right that the >>> closing of >>> #8839 will help. >>> >>> --Tim >>> >>>
