So, in case it will be of any help to you here is the exact message I receive:
julia> Pkg.build("Cxx") INFO: Building Cxx Tuning for julia installation at: /home/kostav/Julian/julia-f428392003/bin BuildBootstrap.Makefile:2: /home/kostav/Julian/julia-f428392003/bin/../../deps/Versions.make: No such file or directory BuildBootstrap.Makefile:3: /home/kostav/Julian/julia-f428392003/bin/../../Make.inc: No such file or directory make: *** No rule to make target '/home/kostav/Julian/julia-f428392003/bin/../../Make.inc'. Stop. =================================[ ERROR: Cxx ]================================= LoadError: failed process: Process(`make -f BuildBootstrap.Makefile JULIA_HOME=/home/kostav/Julian/julia-f428392003/bin`, ProcessExited(2)) [2] while loading /home/kostav/.julia/v0.4/Cxx/deps/build.jl, in expression starting on line 16 ================================================================================ ================================[ BUILD ERRORS ]================================ WARNING: Cxx had build errors. - packages with build errors remain installed in /home/kostav/.julia/v0.4 - build the package(s) and all dependencies with `Pkg.build("Cxx")` - build a single package by running its `deps/build.jl` script ================================================================================ On Saturday, July 18, 2015 at 11:35:32 PM UTC+2, Jeff Waller wrote: > > > > On Saturday, July 18, 2015 at 5:24:33 AM UTC-4, Kostas > Tavlaridis-Gyparakis wrote: >> >> Hello again and thanks a lot for the suggestions. >> Thing is, I went back to the source version of Julia where Cxx is already >> built and >> runs properly, so there wasn't much for me to do, I run in terminal also >> the command of: >> >> "addHeaderDir("/home/kostav/julia/src/")" >> >> Then proceeded again with make install and run the version of julia from >> this folder but >> still not being able to use or install Cxx. So, maybe I didn't understand >> properly what you >> were suggesting for me to do in the source version of Julia... >> Or maybe there is sth else I should try..? >> > > Well it's guesswork on my part, the exact failure would be helpful. > However, I'm going > to try to do this as well. Not exactly the thing you're doing but > related, you're more > familiar with Cxx, and I'm more familiar with embed, let's see what can be > done. >