So, in case it will be of any help to you here is the exact message I
receive:
julia> Pkg.build("Cxx")
INFO: Building Cxx
Tuning for julia installation at: /home/kostav/Julian/julia-f428392003/bin
BuildBootstrap.Makefile:2:
/home/kostav/Julian/julia-f428392003/bin/../../deps/Versions.make: No such
file or directory
BuildBootstrap.Makefile:3:
/home/kostav/Julian/julia-f428392003/bin/../../Make.inc: No such file or
directory
make: *** No rule to make target
'/home/kostav/Julian/julia-f428392003/bin/../../Make.inc'. Stop.
=================================[ ERROR: Cxx
]=================================
LoadError: failed process: Process(`make -f BuildBootstrap.Makefile
JULIA_HOME=/home/kostav/Julian/julia-f428392003/bin`, ProcessExited(2)) [2]
while loading /home/kostav/.julia/v0.4/Cxx/deps/build.jl, in expression
starting on line 16
================================================================================
================================[ BUILD ERRORS
]================================
WARNING: Cxx had build errors.
- packages with build errors remain installed in /home/kostav/.julia/v0.4
- build the package(s) and all dependencies with `Pkg.build("Cxx")`
- build a single package by running its `deps/build.jl` script
================================================================================
On Saturday, July 18, 2015 at 11:35:32 PM UTC+2, Jeff Waller wrote:
>
>
>
> On Saturday, July 18, 2015 at 5:24:33 AM UTC-4, Kostas
> Tavlaridis-Gyparakis wrote:
>>
>> Hello again and thanks a lot for the suggestions.
>> Thing is, I went back to the source version of Julia where Cxx is already
>> built and
>> runs properly, so there wasn't much for me to do, I run in terminal also
>> the command of:
>>
>> "addHeaderDir("/home/kostav/julia/src/")"
>>
>> Then proceeded again with make install and run the version of julia from
>> this folder but
>> still not being able to use or install Cxx. So, maybe I didn't understand
>> properly what you
>> were suggesting for me to do in the source version of Julia...
>> Or maybe there is sth else I should try..?
>>
>
> Well it's guesswork on my part, the exact failure would be helpful.
> However, I'm going
> to try to do this as well. Not exactly the thing you're doing but
> related, you're more
> familiar with Cxx, and I'm more familiar with embed, let's see what can be
> done.
>