I’m planning a migration to move off my dual RR hub architecture which is on aging asr9k’s to newer mx960’s… and during my planning i’m thinking of adding a 3rd. Just makes me feel better.
Aaron > On Dec 5, 2025, at 9:12 AM, Mark Tinka via juniper-nsp > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On 05/12/2025 14:31, Johan Borch via juniper-nsp wrote: >> >> Hi! >> >> In an SR/MP-BGP underlay, will it have a significant impact on device >> performance if we use a full iBGP mesh instead of route reflectors or other >> drawbacks? Let’s say we will end up with around 100 PE routers. These >> routers will not carry an excessive number of prefixes (no full tables). >> We can ignore the configuration part as configuration is auto-generated. > > I'd say if you have 2 or more routers, go with RR's. You will always grow > into more routers, and the RR-based iBGP routing will ease your scaling > logistics. > > It certainly won't complicate your life. > > Mark. > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
