I do lots of DC/DC stuff with power dissipation one of my primary concerns - so 
I stitch and I stitch A LOT.  

These are just some honest thoughts from someone who has done boards with a 
several hundred stitched vias on a board no bigger than 25mmx50mm.

So, stitching that is done in any way using the actual router is unbelievably 
painful.  

1.  Vias can normally be pushed and shoved.  Which is great for routing vias, 
but both annoying and extremely (but pointlessly) computationally expensive if 
the PNS router gets too close.  If the PNS router were James Bond, it's arch 
nemesis is the evil but charismatic Dr. Giant Grid of Vias Right Next to Each 
Other But With Gaps To Move Around A Bit.  

2.  Vias that behave in all the ways they behave from an interface standpoint 
are not very conducive to stitching.  Stitching does not involve routing at 
all, you're stitching two copper planes together.  There is no advantage I can 
see to using the routing tool/mode to stitching, but several disadvantages. 

I've yet to see a proposed solution that is faster or easier than having a 
handful of "via" footprints, which are simply single through holes without any 
mask layers, and placing one manually, setting the net, and going nuts with 
copy % paste. 

The only problem with this is that footprints are also not ideal and will get 
deleted with other "extra" footprints if you reimport the next list, stuff like 
that. 

Via stitching done via the routing tool is just a huge pain in the butt.  

I do like the idea of automatically connecting unconnected holes that span 
pours of the same net though.  That's a good idea.  What would be awesome, in 
my opinion, is doing this but in a way where one is not limited to Vias 
specifically, or perhaps an alternative stitch tool with different behaviors 
than the normal routing tool.

I know a few times, I've forgotten to set the net for my initial via footprint, 
or set it to the wrong one, only to realize this after placing 200 of them.  
Painful mistake that could be solved with something like this :). 

On Sep 24, 2016, at 6:06 AM, Heikki Pulkkinen <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi everybody,
> 
> This is my suggestion to via stitching without any tracks. It connects 
> unconnected vias in different copper pours witch has same netcode. Adding 
> vias is normal routing process without routing tracks. Start - Change Layer - 
> End. Tool that do those things automatically would be good, so you can add 
> all vias in same layer. After adding vias, run "Fill or Refill All Zones" 
> that "Clenup tracks and vias" do not remove partly connected vias.
> 
> 
> Heikki
> <diffs_via.txt>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> Post to     : [email protected]
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to     : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to