Dexter Filmore wrote:
> > 
> > > Yes I know, that's initiating a desktop flame war, but there's no
> > > need for 20 desktops, no need to reinvent the wheel over and over
> > > (fluxbox has a taskbar, a window manager, virtual desktops, xfce
> > > has: a taskbar, a window manager, virtual desktops.
> > 
> > What you really mean is that there is no such need for *you*. The
> > rest of us can speak for ourselves.
> 
> Do you need 20 different desktops that are basically the same? 

No. I only need one.

However, nineteen other people I know prefer and work better with
something totaly different.

> > > ...rather join their efforts and make one highly configurable
> > > desktop that can be adapted to one taste instead of having a ton
> > > of systems with one or two nice ideas but nothing else)
> > 
> > You mean like Windows, and OSX.
> 
> Nice way putting words in my mouth. No I did not. Read again.

You are able to replace the window manager (Explorer) on Windows. I know
this was true for the 95 variant, I have no idea about any current
version.

I had actually replaced Explorer once. I wish I could remember the name.
All I can tell you is that it had a Window Maker look and feel to it.

If you look now, you can still find Explorer.exe replacements. This kind
of shoots your theory of ``one size fits all'' approach to hell.

I don't know who said this first, but meditate upon this:
        One size fits all fits no one well.

-john


-- 
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to