On Jan 21, 2008 5:11 PM, Paul G. Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Richard Reynolds wrote: > > On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, Paul G. Allen wrote: > > > comcast definately rings a bell, or sorespot :D not as bad as cox, who > > has horrible spam policies and no technically inclined people running > > there mail setup. > > Yes, I know. I am currently having trouble with my personal mail > regarding Cox. I can't report phishing or spam to anyone because when I > send such a report through the Cox mail server (the report would contain > the header of the offending e-mail and sometimes the body of the > e-mail), it refuses it as spam. Complaining to Cox has so far resulted > in responses from people that are completely clueless and should > probably not even be allowed near a computer at all! > > > > >> I have checked most of the blacklists and our server IP > >> (12.184.45.102) does not appear on any of them. > > thats a good start but did you specifically check the comcast RBL our > > just the public ones? they offer there own and a get out of jail page at > > www.comcastsupport.com/rbl > > Been there, done that, filled out the form, no response from Comcast yet.
Could this be an SPF issue? > > PGA > -- > Paul G. Allen, BSIT/SE > Network Administrator > Greenest Host > www.greenesthost.com > > > -- > > [email protected] > http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list > -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
