On Jan 25, 2008 10:06 AM, David Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 08:37:58AM -0800, kelsey hudson wrote: > > David Brown wrote: > >> Another common memory test is to create a reiserfs partition and see > how > >> badly it corrupts itself. > > > > It's likely to do that *without* bad memory anyways. I've never before > seen > > such an awesome concept implemented so poorly. *every* *time* i've used > > reiserfs it's somehow corrupted itself. It may be a tad faster than XFS > > (which, mind you, I've never had corrupt), but if it's not accurate then > I > > can't trust it. I'll take a small reduction in speed for a large > increase > > in reliability every time. > > Slackware used to have ReiserFS as the default filesystem for quite a few years (up until this latest version) so I've always used it. I use it on my mp3 server, file server and desktops and never had a problem. Is there a problem with larger drives using ReiserFS, lots of files or is it with any drive?
-- Gossamer Axe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gypsy.sytes.net/ -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
