begin quoting Christopher Smith as of Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 05:52:51PM -0700: > Rick Funderburg wrote: [snip] > >Close, but I would prefer it to be time based. That way, the delay > >would be uniform for each message, and I would not have to remember to > >flush the last mail. > > > >Unfortunately, even Outlook does not have a uniform delay for each > >message. It just runs the Send/Receive function on a configurable > >interval. If I write my message close to the time that the Send/Receive > >function is to be run, the window of time in which I can realize my > >mistake may be less than I would like. Luckily, for most of the > >mistakes I have in mind, the realization that I have made a mistake > >occurs in the second or two after I click the send button. > > So with sendmail you can definitely set it to "always queue" messages > and then flush the queue on a periodic basis. This would precisely > simulate your Outlook behavior.
He'd also want a quick and easy way to abort the sending. How would he do that from Thunderbird? -- _ |\_ \| -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-lpsg
