Paul G. Allen wrote:
I guess you want someone to create a couple as proof, and then I suppose
you'll say, "So, that's one, I want more."
No. I didn't ask if there were any documents that OO could read that MS
Word couldn't. The statement was made that there are *more* documents
that OO can read than MS can read. Giving me samples doesn't really do much.
It's like saying "Linux is more robust than Windows", and then showing
me Windows crashes to prove it. But until you *count* something, you're
not comparing measurements. You're just giving examples.
It's a poor business choice to do otherwise, and businesses do it all
the time and then complain about it after the fact.
Some do, some don't. Again, it's a question of cost vs benefit. You're
just oversimplifying, methinks.
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
His kernel fu is strong.
He studied at the Shao Linux Temple.
--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-lpsg
