Ralph Shumaker wrote:
This one has me wondering 'a "no" then' to what? But I'm not going to go digging through my trash folder to find out.

I asked if he had any kind of cite to back up the claim that OO can read more Word documents than Word can. He cited personal experiences, so the answer was "no", because personal experiences are subject to selection bias and sample space errors.

Because of this, I find that I'm beginning to have the tendency to skip (delete) your emails and just read the replies to them. And I don't like this tendency because I like some of the info and opinions you give.

OK. I'll try to keep more context. I work on the basis that disk is cheap and mail clients are sophisticated, so when a list actually maintains the threading, I don't quote anything I'm not directly replying to. Comes from using way too much email, I guess.

--
  Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
    His kernel fu is strong.
    He studied at the Shao Linux Temple.

--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-lpsg

Reply via email to