On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 03:17:53PM -0700, John H. Robinson, IV wrote: > Lan Barnes wrote: > > On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 02:50:30PM -0700, John H. Robinson, IV wrote: > > > > > > It would also make some very angry ex-board members for them to be told > > > this when SDMUG turns over their assets. If I were being mean and evil, > > > I would verify (through the monthly SIG reports to the Board) that their > > > membership is limited to only SDMUG. I would ask if SDMUG was officially > > > separated from SDCS, and upon hearing yes, I would then inform them that > > > their tenure as SDCS members and members of the SDCS Board was then > > > nullified. That would be quite the fireworks. > > > > I suspect they'll be happy to leave. > > It is one thing to leave on your own account. It is another thing to be > chased out by your own ill-thought out rules. To do such a think would > be to ensure very bad blood between SDCS(KPLUG) and SDMUG. Probably not > what we want. >
Welllll .... it's too late for that, but we didn't originate it ;-) I agree we don't want to add to it. -- Lan Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Guy, SCM Specialist 858-354-0616 -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-steer
