On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 02:50:30PM -0700, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> Neil Schneider wrote:
> > 
> > [A bunch of stuff about the separation of SDMUG from SDCS that I
> > snipped.]
> 
> The basic questions are:
> 1) Has SDMUG been officially separated?
> 2) If yes, are SDMUG members still SDCS members?
> 
> If SDMUG has not been officially separated, then all of this is moot.
> I contend that SDMUG is still a SIG of SDCS.
> 
> Since I cannot cut/n/paste from http://www.sdcs.org/SIG-Guidelines.pdf
> 
> It would also make some very angry ex-board members for them to be told
> this when SDMUG turns over their assets. If I were being mean and evil,
> I would verify (through the monthly SIG reports to the Board) that their
> membership is limited to only SDMUG. I would ask if SDMUG was officially
> separated from SDCS, and upon hearing yes, I would then inform them that
> their tenure as SDCS members and members of the SDCS Board was then
> nullified. That would be quite the fireworks.
> 
> To be really evil, I'd verify this with a lawyer, and have said lawyer
> present. Anyone know any bored lawyers that feel like doing some pro-
> bono work?
> 
> -john
> 

I suspect they'll be happy to leave.

-- 
Lan Barnes                    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Guy, SCM Specialist     858-354-0616

-- 
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-steer

Reply via email to