begin quoting Gregory K. Ruiz-Ade as of Tue, May 10, 2005 at 11:42:34AM -0700: > On Tuesday 10 May 2005 11:10 am, Lan Barnes wrote: > > > How about when their dues run out? > > > > > > Even if SDMUG chooses to secede, the individual members are SDCS > > > members until their dues run out, like it or not. > > Andrew's point is well taken; SDMUG membership's SDCS membership status is > valid until the dues expire, regardless of additional memberships in other > organizations.
I'm bang behind this point, as distasteful as it may be. > SDMUG members are SDCS members until such time as their dues run out. The > fact that members of SDMUG have voted to effectively disband the SDMUG SIG > of SDCS and reform SDMUG as its own organization does not dissolve SDMUG > member's membership status in SDCS. Yes. > Any SDCS meeting for the purpose of board elections will be required to have > a quorum calculated by including the paid membership of SDMUG. I > guestimate this number at 70 members. I'll do my best to make it to such a meeting to help reach the quorum... > > If we have enough non-SDMUG board members to replace them in the > > offices, I would be inclined to ask them to resign from their board > > officerships next board meeting ... really nicely. They probably would. > > At this point, I'm honestly tempted to offer to step in as SDCS president. I'll vote for ya. > > I also thing amending the by-laws to permit written proxies (or even > > email proxies) is a good idea. > > Written proxies are one thing. Email proxies should only be considered > acceptable if they are OpenPGP signed, and the signature is trusted. It is > _far_ too easy to fake email, as we should all well be aware. Indeed. -Stewart
pgpsp1C3k9E2j.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-steer
