A Bonanza can be properly trimmed and is dynamically stable.  A stock KR can do 
neither.  I guess 1400 hrs in a KR wasn't enough training to hone my skills.

Still not a qualified as a "real" KR pilot, but at least I'm a slow learner. 
:o) <- smiley face just in case someone misses my humor.

-Jeff Scott



> Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 at 9:48 AM
> From: "Tommy Waymack" <5blind...@gmail.com>
> To: "KRnet" <krnet@list.krnet.org>
> Subject: KR>Re: KR flight characteristics
>
> After 27 years of flying a stock kr2 . I Still hear here people complaining
> about how the airplane is pitch sensitive. Maybe there is something to be
> said for pilot training. would not change a thing.Beech Bonanza is pitch
> sensitive too. Tommy W.
>
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 3:21 PM Flesner <fles...@frontier.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > n 8/22/2021 1:25 PM, Jeff Scott wrote:
> >
> > > I flew my KR for 500 hrs without any drag producing devices.  Then I
> > > added flaps and significantly modified the tail.  I don't think I ever
> > > landed without flaps again other than for training purposes.  The
> > > larger tail and deployable drag greatly expanded the operating
> > > envelope of my KR with much improved crosswind performance.  My KR
> > > suddenly changed from a calm day flyer to a plane that I could fly in
> > > almost any VFR weather.
> > >
> > > -Jeff Scott
> >
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >
> >
> >
> > It's unfortunate that the KR's have the reputation they have based on
> > the original KR2.  The 2S built now days is a sleeper on the market.
> > When Jeff moved up to a larger air frame (RV6) he sold one of the best
> > equipped KR's on the market, 50% faster on the same fuel burn, than a
> > C150 for less than $20K.  The Wisconsin KR2S just auctioned off is
> > another example of a great bargain.
> >
> > The major problem with the KR is that people have out grown the design.
> > A 200 pound pilot wants to carry a180 pound passenger in a small air
> > frame using 75 h.p.  If the 200 pound owner would consider the airplane
> > to be a great single place, and make a few mods to improve the flying
> > characteristics if desired, they would enjoy owning and flying the KR.
> > Mark Langford, being the size person the KR was designed for 50 years
> > ago, flies one of the most stock KR2's all over the Midwest on a regular
> > basis.  The flying characteristics are acceptable enough so that he is
> > not yet motivated to repair the 2S he flew prior to that and put it back
> > in the air.
> >
> > The KR has it's flaws but all are well know and can be designed out to
> > have a great flying, economical airplane.  That's why it still has it's
> > followers.
> >
> > Larry Flesner
> > ________________________________
> > -Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
> > -Change list delivery options at
> > https://list.krnet.org/list/krnet.list.krnet.org/ Affinity List Info Board
> > -Search recent KRnet Archives at
> > https://list.krnet.org/empathy/list/krnet.list.krnet.org/
> > -Search <https://list.krnet.org/empathy/list/krnet.list.krnet.org/-Search>
> > John Bouyea's decades of archive at
> > https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/
> ________________________________
> -Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
> -Change list delivery options at 
> https://list.krnet.org/list/krnet.list.krnet.org/ Affinity List Info Board
> -Search recent KRnet Archives at  
> https://list.krnet.org/empathy/list/krnet.list.krnet.org/
> -Search John Bouyea's decades of archive at 
> https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/
>
________________________________
-Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
-Change list delivery options at 
https://list.krnet.org/list/krnet.list.krnet.org/ Affinity List Info Board
-Search recent KRnet Archives at  
https://list.krnet.org/empathy/list/krnet.list.krnet.org/
-Search John Bouyea's decades of archive at 
https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/ 

Reply via email to