Alan Coopersmith wrote: > Casper.Dik at Sun.COM wrote: >>> I suggest to make /bin/ksh ksh93 from the beginning that you don't >>> have to deal with any backwards compatibility fuzz later >> >> If you want PowerPC Solaris and SPARC/x86 Solaris be that different, >> then yes; if you want scripts to be compatible I suggest not. > > What other choice is there when the current ksh is a closed binary? > Will Sun be building the closed binaries for PPC? >
Could someone involved from SunLabs could port it and build it? -steve -- stephen lau // stevel at sun.com | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net opensolaris // solaris kernel development