On Fri, 28 Jul 2006, Martin Bochnig wrote: > okay. > If (and only if) 3rd parties are involved into the libC* thing, > I _would_ understand it.
Would a statement by a Sun employee (provided, of course, thet such a license doesn't prohibit Sun from doing so) clarifying the situation help? > What I still would not understand - however - is, why the Distros-JDK > (on which SUNW has made so much noise about, back in May'06) has not > been built with the open gcc. Perhaps they did it for performance reasons? I know *I* avoid building anything with gcc unless I absolutely have to. -- Rich Teer, SCNA, SCSA, OpenSolaris CAB member President, Rite Online Inc. Voice: +1 (250) 979-1638 URL: http://www.rite-group.com/rich
