I'm +1 on creating a SIG-Azure, and additionally creating a SIG-Cloud or 
similar at some later date. There are certainly cross cutting concerns that 
in an ideal world, no cloud-specific SIG should figure out in isolation. In 
my mind a SIG-Cloud should be a gathering place for all the cloud-specific 
groups to come together, identify these concerns, and solve them together.

On Thursday, May 18, 2017 at 10:52:50 AM UTC-7, Brandon Philips wrote:
>
> Hey Everyone-
>
> +1 for SIG formation from me.
>
> Someone from CoreOS can be involved in this SIG as we rely on the Azure 
> cloud integrations in CoreOS Tectonic. The same folks involved in SIG AWS 
> and pushing AWS features forward can help with cross-cloud SIG comms too.
>
> Aside, as it was mentioned during the call today: I had discussed creating 
> a SIG Cloud at some point in various forums. But, I have been too busy with 
> all of the bootstrap governance stuff to tackle that next. Obviously 
> getting governance in place is higher priority and should help make that 
> decision.
>
> Thank You,
>
> Brandon
>
> On Monday, May 15, 2017 at 6:14:18 AM UTC-7, Jason Singer DuMars wrote:
>>
>> All,
>>
>> I'd like to revive the effort to create 
>> <https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/sig-creation-procedure.md>
>>  
>> SIG-Azure that was referenced in both this 
>> <https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/36> PR and this 
>> <https://github.com/kubernetes/community/issues/188> issue.    
>>
>> *Proposed mission statement:*
>>
>> A Special Interest Group for building, deploying, maintaining, 
>> supporting, and using Kubernetes on Azure Container Service.
>>
>> *Secondary statement:*
>>
>> The SIG will be responsible for designing, discussing, and maintaining 
>> the Azure cloud provider and its relevant tests. The SIG will also be 
>> responsible for any roadmap and release requirements for Kubernetes on 
>> Azure.
>>
>> *Rationale and Raison D'ĂȘtre: *
>>
>> Since the time of the discussion linked above, Microsoft has become 
>> strategically-focused on Kubernetes as an indispensable component in the 
>> Azure ecosystem.  This was underscored by the recent acquisition of Deis 
>> and GA rollout of Kubernetes in Azure Container Service.  
>>
>> The purposes of the SIG are specifically:
>>
>> - Provide a consistent and accountable interface to the Kubernetes 
>> project/product management structure for features specific to the Azure 
>> cloud provider, as well as a readout space for efforts undertaken in other 
>> SIGs 
>>
>> - Help organize the rapidly-growing ACS Kubernetes community for 
>> knowledge-sharing and feedback ~ ideally creating more engagement across 
>> the project as a whole
>>
>> - Establish a clear channel for ACS-specific Kubernetes community 
>> support, so it does not get misdirected into SIG-Windows
>>
>> - Building and curating documentation for Kubernetes on Azure
>> - Provide a point of contact to build and maintain Azure-specific e2e 
>> tests for Kubernetes
>>
>> - Coordinating requirements for Azure integrators like ACS-Engine, 
>> CoreOS Tectonic for Azure
>>
>> - Raise visibility within Microsoft of opportunities to contribute and 
>> give back to Kubernetes
>>
>> *SIG Disambiguation:*
>>
>> To address potential overlap concerns with SIG-Windows, this group is 
>> specific to *workloads running in Azure Container Service*.  The mission 
>> of SIG-Windows is complimentary not preemptory.  Also, if a SIG-Cloud 
>> umbrella comes to fruition in the future, we will re-evaluate the need for 
>> this separate SIG at that point.  The last thing we need is SIG sprawl.
>>
>> *Implementation:*
>>
>> For implementation, I will be the initial point of contact and will at a 
>> minimum ensure scheduling, documentation, transparency, and facilitation 
>> are consistent with Kubernetes community SIG standards. Initial (and 
>> possibly provisional) leadership will be Jason Hansen 
>> <https://github.com/slack> and Cole Mickens 
>> <https://github.com/colemickens>.
>>
>> An initial meeting cadence will be bi-weekly, and after the SIG is 
>> properly set up in Groups, Slack and other communications channels, the 
>> initial and subsequent meeting times will be radiated to the community.
>>
>> I'd like to work out concerns ahead of the 5/18 community meeting so that 
>> the SIG may be discussed and ideally approved at that time. 
>>
>> Please let me know your questions and concerns.
>>
>> Kindest regards,
>> Jaice Singer DuMars
>> co-lead of SIG Cluster Ops
>> ~ Formerly @Deis, Now @Microsoft
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to kubernetes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to kubernetes-users@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/kubernetes-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
  • [kubernetes-use... Jaice DuMars
    • [kubernete... Ihor Dvoretskyi
      • [kuber... 'Tim Hockin' via Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A
    • [kubernete... Brandon Philips
      • [kuber... aaron
        • [k... michelle
          • ... 'Saad Ali' via Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A
            • ... Jason Singer DuMars
              • ... 'Brian Grant' via Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A
    • [kubernete... Jack Francis
    • [kubernete... jack quincy
      • [kuber... 'Eric Tune' via Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A
        • [k... 'Tim Hockin' via Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A
          • ... 'Tim Hockin' via Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A
            • ... 'Sarah Novotny' via Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A

Reply via email to