+1 on creating SIG Azure especially for representing the ACS-specific 
Kubernetes community and their needs.

+1 on Aaron's point.

On Thursday, May 18, 2017 at 1:56:59 PM UTC-4, aa...@deis.com wrote:
>
> I'm +1 on creating a SIG-Azure, and additionally creating a SIG-Cloud or 
> similar at some later date. There are certainly cross cutting concerns that 
> in an ideal world, no cloud-specific SIG should figure out in isolation. In 
> my mind a SIG-Cloud should be a gathering place for all the cloud-specific 
> groups to come together, identify these concerns, and solve them together.
>
> On Thursday, May 18, 2017 at 10:52:50 AM UTC-7, Brandon Philips wrote:
>>
>> Hey Everyone-
>>
>> +1 for SIG formation from me.
>>
>> Someone from CoreOS can be involved in this SIG as we rely on the Azure 
>> cloud integrations in CoreOS Tectonic. The same folks involved in SIG AWS 
>> and pushing AWS features forward can help with cross-cloud SIG comms too.
>>
>> Aside, as it was mentioned during the call today: I had discussed 
>> creating a SIG Cloud at some point in various forums. But, I have been too 
>> busy with all of the bootstrap governance stuff to tackle that next. 
>> Obviously getting governance in place is higher priority and should help 
>> make that decision.
>>
>> Thank You,
>>
>> Brandon
>>
>> On Monday, May 15, 2017 at 6:14:18 AM UTC-7, Jason Singer DuMars wrote:
>>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> I'd like to revive the effort to create 
>>> <https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/sig-creation-procedure.md>
>>>  
>>> SIG-Azure that was referenced in both this 
>>> <https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/36> PR and this 
>>> <https://github.com/kubernetes/community/issues/188> issue.    
>>>
>>> *Proposed mission statement:*
>>>
>>> A Special Interest Group for building, deploying, maintaining, 
>>> supporting, and using Kubernetes on Azure Container Service.
>>>
>>> *Secondary statement:*
>>>
>>> The SIG will be responsible for designing, discussing, and maintaining 
>>> the Azure cloud provider and its relevant tests. The SIG will also be 
>>> responsible for any roadmap and release requirements for Kubernetes on 
>>> Azure.
>>>
>>> *Rationale and Raison D'ĂȘtre: *
>>>
>>> Since the time of the discussion linked above, Microsoft has become 
>>> strategically-focused on Kubernetes as an indispensable component in the 
>>> Azure ecosystem.  This was underscored by the recent acquisition of Deis 
>>> and GA rollout of Kubernetes in Azure Container Service.  
>>>
>>> The purposes of the SIG are specifically:
>>>
>>> - Provide a consistent and accountable interface to the Kubernetes 
>>> project/product management structure for features specific to the Azure 
>>> cloud provider, as well as a readout space for efforts undertaken in other 
>>> SIGs 
>>>
>>> - Help organize the rapidly-growing ACS Kubernetes community for 
>>> knowledge-sharing and feedback ~ ideally creating more engagement across 
>>> the project as a whole
>>>
>>> - Establish a clear channel for ACS-specific Kubernetes community 
>>> support, so it does not get misdirected into SIG-Windows
>>>
>>> - Building and curating documentation for Kubernetes on Azure
>>> - Provide a point of contact to build and maintain Azure-specific e2e 
>>> tests for Kubernetes
>>>
>>> - Coordinating requirements for Azure integrators like ACS-Engine, 
>>> CoreOS Tectonic for Azure
>>>
>>> - Raise visibility within Microsoft of opportunities to contribute and 
>>> give back to Kubernetes
>>>
>>> *SIG Disambiguation:*
>>>
>>> To address potential overlap concerns with SIG-Windows, this group is 
>>> specific to *workloads running in Azure Container Service*.  The 
>>> mission of SIG-Windows is complimentary not preemptory.  Also, if a 
>>> SIG-Cloud umbrella comes to fruition in the future, we will re-evaluate the 
>>> need for this separate SIG at that point.  The last thing we need is SIG 
>>> sprawl.
>>>
>>> *Implementation:*
>>>
>>> For implementation, I will be the initial point of contact and will at a 
>>> minimum ensure scheduling, documentation, transparency, and facilitation 
>>> are consistent with Kubernetes community SIG standards. Initial (and 
>>> possibly provisional) leadership will be Jason Hansen 
>>> <https://github.com/slack> and Cole Mickens 
>>> <https://github.com/colemickens>.
>>>
>>> An initial meeting cadence will be bi-weekly, and after the SIG is 
>>> properly set up in Groups, Slack and other communications channels, the 
>>> initial and subsequent meeting times will be radiated to the community.
>>>
>>> I'd like to work out concerns ahead of the 5/18 community meeting so 
>>> that the SIG may be discussed and ideally approved at that time. 
>>>
>>> Please let me know your questions and concerns.
>>>
>>> Kindest regards,
>>> Jaice Singer DuMars
>>> co-lead of SIG Cluster Ops
>>> ~ Formerly @Deis, Now @Microsoft
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to kubernetes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to kubernetes-users@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/kubernetes-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
  • [kubernetes-use... Jaice DuMars
    • [kubernete... Ihor Dvoretskyi
      • [kuber... 'Tim Hockin' via Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A
    • [kubernete... Brandon Philips
      • [kuber... aaron
        • [k... michelle
          • ... 'Saad Ali' via Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A
            • ... Jason Singer DuMars
              • ... 'Brian Grant' via Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A
    • [kubernete... Jack Francis
    • [kubernete... jack quincy
      • [kuber... 'Eric Tune' via Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A
        • [k... 'Tim Hockin' via Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A
          • ... 'Tim Hockin' via Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A
            • ... 'Sarah Novotny' via Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A
              • ... 'Tim Hockin' via Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A

Reply via email to