In a message dated 10/25/2001 6:47:00 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Hew! Somebody touched a nerve.
Don't know why you say this, I only pointed out a few of my thoughts,
> I truly dot understand your points, Phil. Denigrating someone because
>they have a different opinion isn't exactly the way to win an argument.
I was not trying to win the argument, just trying to point out a few thoughts
from a Panasonic dealer's point, In fact I don't disagree with most of what
duc say's.
>On the point of Panasonic falling behind. Look at the way they handle CID.
> Maybe its not behind but having to use Panasonic phones that cost 4-10X
>POTS+CID phones blows. Yeah, yeah, lots of great features but even my
>dealer tries to steer me away from the KIT compatible cordless phones
>(which I have to get for cordless+CID) because they have no distance. So,
>I'm stuck with either shitty expensive cordless+CID phones or just sticking
>to one good POTS+CID. I believe the logging of CID is screwy (lowest number
>phone only) as well and I've heard of a lot of limitations with the Toss
>and CID. look at all the squarely things people do to work around the
> limitations.
Are you kidding... Panasonic KX-T7885 Sug. price 385.00, KX-TD7895 Sug. 425.00
are both 900Mhz, (the 7895 is spread spectrum and does have good range) Are
half the price of Nortel, or Lucent type of business cordless phone sets.
Sorry if the consumer cordless sets are kicking ass on the business
division but they do not work hand in hand with each other. The caller ID
does show up on both models, logging calls has always been a poor working
feature of Panasonic business system. I always cover that with any customer
looking to add caller ID, There are a lot of little things that can make
purchasing something other then a Panasonic a smart move, all systems have
something that make sales and service people say "why don't they change that"
