Bernd Fondermann wrote:
Fellow researchers,
to actually bring this crypto statement stuff forward I'd like to call a
vote. At first I thought lazy consensus would work, but I am not so sure
anymore (triggered by the comments in the thread starting here [1]), so
a vote is the safe way to go.
We have to report about the use of crypto code in Labs. Following the
instructions at [2], we should apply labs_crypto2.patch attached to JIRA
here [3] to its destination file found here[4].
Please vote:
[] Yes, apply the patch as described and kindly ask the Labs PMC chair
to send out the email as described in [2] afterwards.
[] I don't know, I don't care for this whole crypto stuff really much
[] No, don't apply the patch, there is something wrong with it. (Give
some reason, please)
The vote will not close before 2008-06-30 12:00 GMT.
With my chair hat on, I have a hard time executing the above since I
can't possibly be responsible of looking into every lab and hunt for
crypto stuff. I'm not even a crypto expert, I wouldn't even know what to
look for. I mean, is MD5 considered crypto? I wouldn't know.
I can go ahead and apply the existing patch, sure, no problems. But I
would like every single PI to tell me: yes, I've looked at it and it's
for for me.
Not before then.
--
Stefano.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
