Mads Toftum wrote: > On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 12:37:40PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >> Right, I was just making the observation that apr is still on the hook >> even though it isn't a shipping product, and for BadCA I hope we do finally >> round out the API to satisfy the objections from [EMAIL PROTECTED] (and ship >> a 1.4.0 >> officially that BadCA can consume). >> > That would indeed be goodness even if BadCA doesn't need it. > BadCA uses openssl certificate functions through its own python > interface, iirc, the main focus of openssl support in apr was to get ssl > support for connections.
That and to provide the ability to decouple from openssl so that we had more flexibility. Maybe one day... > > vh > > Mads Toftum --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
