Mads Toftum wrote:
GPG will most likely be added to the mix as well given the planned design, but other than that I think that'll be ok. I was looking at the notice for httpd earlier and that one deviates from what BadCA needs because crypto isn't optional here.
Yes - it is a little different, and if we bind later to some libgpg we can address it then.
As for the bit about the crypto living on an obscure branch of apr, that wasn't the case last time BadCA was active - at that point the code was in trunk.
Right, I was just making the observation that apr is still on the hook even though it isn't a shipping product, and for BadCA I hope we do finally round out the API to satisfy the objections from [EMAIL PROTECTED] (and ship a 1.4.0 officially that BadCA can consume). Bill --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
