On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 12:37:40PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Right, I was just making the observation that apr is still on the hook > even though it isn't a shipping product, and for BadCA I hope we do finally > round out the API to satisfy the objections from [EMAIL PROTECTED] (and ship > a 1.4.0 > officially that BadCA can consume). > That would indeed be goodness even if BadCA doesn't need it. BadCA uses openssl certificate functions through its own python interface, iirc, the main focus of openssl support in apr was to get ssl support for connections.
vh Mads Toftum -- http://soulfood.dk --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
