William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > David Reid wrote: >> >> To clarify - badca isn't planned, nor has it ever been planned, to be a >> consumer of apr. > > Then color me confused, I thought BadCA was just one of several reasons to > add ssl support to apr. Glad to know apr isn't a showstopper, here.
No idea where that came from, but it's never been part of the plan wrt BaDCA. david > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > !DSPAM:16,48652e3373209974735230! > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
