On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitt...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 10:00 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Jukka Zitting seems to have been active on some lists in late 2013 > > I still am. The reason I didn't participate in this vote was that I > asked to resign from the Labs PMC (see private@labs) due to lack of > time and sufficient interest. > > As for this vote and the related debate, here's what I'd do:
+1 to all three proposals. The VP can take these executive decisions on a consensus basis. They can be re-endorsed or rejected later on, when the PMC has been cleaned up and the bylaws amended. Paralysis causes greater damage than a wrong formal decision, IMO. Regards Santiago > > 1) Start the lab. There's no point in holding back productive work > while the process and policy issues are being sorted out. Nobody > objected to the proposed lab and there's no conceivable harm it could > do to the ASF or Labs, so I'd just go ahead and start working on the > lab, regardless of what the bylaws say. > > 2) Fix the PMC. Ask all non-active members whether they want to > continue as PMC members. Drop everyone who says no or fails to respond > within reasonable time. Make it clear that they can always get back to > the PMC just by asking. > > 3) Fix the bylaws. Drop the extra ceremony that's causing trouble like > this. If needed, make a the fixes retroactive to make everyone happy > with step 1. > > BR, > > Jukka Zitting > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: labs-unsubscr...@labs.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: labs-h...@labs.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: labs-unsubscr...@labs.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: labs-h...@labs.apache.org
