On 2 May 2015, at 20:01, Gerard Meijssen <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hoi, > The code az is fpr a macro language. There are two languages North and South > Azerbaijani. North Azerbaijani is written in several scripts according to > Ethnologue. To the point where it was only written in the Arab script until > the 1920's Having it in the Latin script which is official in Azerbaijan is > fine when we rename this project to azj. Gerard, PLEASE learn the difference between “when” and “if”. It really matters. > I am fine with having an azb under the circumstances when they truly want to > deny their roots. Don’t be so judgemental where a practical matter is in question. There’s nothing wrong with az-latn.wikipedia.org and az-arab.wikipedia.org either, using script codes. Or az.wikipedia.org as it is and a new az-arab.wikipedia.org The chief question seems to be script, not language. Ethnologue at least says nothing about mutual intelligibility. Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/ _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
