I agree with Michael. Moving az to azj is unnecessary and would cause
more problems than it would solve.
On 2015-05-12 11:55, Michael Everson wrote:
On 12 May 2015, at 09:17, Mjbmr <[email protected]> wrote:
After a lot of researches I'm in favor of moving az to azj.
I oppose this. That would break many existing links. We also did not move
Bokmål from no to nb.
In the bibliographical world, az is used primarily for the national language of
the state of Azerbaijan. The overwhelming majority of text in any Azeri
language is in Northern Azeri, whether in Cyrillic or in Latin. Southern Azeri
does not have the same place in the educational system of Iran, for instance.
There is much less text in it.
We should add azb and move Arabic-script articles there and leave az alone.
I have fundamental opposition to moving az to azj.
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
--
Dr. Antony Green
Rudolf-Seiffert-Str. 31, WE 1703
10369 Berlin, Germany
Phone: +49 (0)30 34 50 98 97
Mobile: +49 (0)176 82 29 59 20
E-mail: [email protected]
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
