Let alone the fact that moving wikis is impossible anyway at the moment. Am 12.05.2015 12:00 schrieb "Antony Green" <[email protected]>:
> I agree with Michael. Moving az to azj is unnecessary and would cause more > problems than it would solve. > > On 2015-05-12 11:55, Michael Everson wrote: > >> On 12 May 2015, at 09:17, Mjbmr <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> After a lot of researches I'm in favor of moving az to azj. >>> >> I oppose this. That would break many existing links. We also did not move >> Bokmål from no to nb. >> >> In the bibliographical world, az is used primarily for the national >> language of the state of Azerbaijan. The overwhelming majority of text in >> any Azeri language is in Northern Azeri, whether in Cyrillic or in Latin. >> Southern Azeri does not have the same place in the educational system of >> Iran, for instance. There is much less text in it. >> >> We should add azb and move Arabic-script articles there and leave az >> alone. >> >> I have fundamental opposition to moving az to azj. >> >> Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/ >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Langcom mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >> > > -- > Dr. Antony Green > Rudolf-Seiffert-Str. 31, WE 1703 > 10369 Berlin, Germany > > Phone: +49 (0)30 34 50 98 97 > Mobile: +49 (0)176 82 29 59 20 > E-mail: [email protected] > > > _______________________________________________ > Langcom mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >
_______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
