Gerard, we are talking here via the list [email protected]. Am I missing something?
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Gerard Meijssen <[email protected]> wrote: > Hoi, > The right mailing list is the mailing list of the language committee. All > its members are subscribed to that one. > Thanks, > GerardM > > On 30 November 2015 at 14:14, Milos Rancic <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 1:08 PM, MF-Warburg <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I don't understand. If ka.ws fulfills the activity requirements, it can >>> be approved. Did anyone check it already? >>> >> No :) I am a bit out of regular LangCom duties, so I actually asked that >> inside of the first email. >> >> On the other side, I do think we should make WS requests approval much >> quicker, as in the most of the new requests, it will be used for language >> preservation. >> >> Gerard, may you explain what do you think with "It is the wrong >> mailinglist for that." What's the right method to discuss this in your >> opinion? >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Langcom mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Langcom mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom > >
_______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
