Hoi,
There is a difference between automatic approval and automatic creation. It
does not make sense to create projects because we can. It only makes sense
when there are people who make the point by asking, by making an argument.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 1 December 2015 at 00:06, Leon Liesener <[email protected]>
wrote:
> What makes an own Wikisource subdomain that much better than storing the
> content on OldWS?
> The disadvantage with an automatic approval of Wikisources I see is that
> while a community might be big enough to maintain 1 project, it does not
> automatically mean they will also be able to maintain 2 of them.
>
> Regards,
> Leon
>
> > Op 30 nov. 2015 om 15:53 heeft Milos Rancic <[email protected]> het
> volgende geschreven:
> >
> > Yes, from "Wikimedia Foundation Language Committee"... My Gmail has
> > taken this description by default from somebody...
> >
> > So, first, MF-Warburg says Georgian Wikisource should go regularly.
> >
> > I suggest Neapolitan Wikisource should go fast forward.
> >
> > And I suggest we amend the rules which would say something like "After
> > the first project created, community can get Wikisource at any point
> > of time." -- or whatever appropriate.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Gerard Meijssen
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Hoi,
> >> You are not. My bad, it shows as wikimedia, I thought it was wikimedia-l
> >> Thanks,
> >> GerardM
> >>
> >>> On 30 November 2015 at 15:24, Milos Rancic <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Gerard, we are talking here via the list [email protected].
> Am I
> >>> missing something?
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Gerard Meijssen
> >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hoi,
> >>>> The right mailing list is the mailing list of the language committee.
> All
> >>>> its members are subscribed to that one.
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> GerardM
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 30 November 2015 at 14:14, Milos Rancic <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 1:08 PM, MF-Warburg <
> [email protected]>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I don't understand. If ka.ws fulfills the activity requirements,
> it can
> >>>>>> be approved. Did anyone check it already?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> No :) I am a bit out of regular LangCom duties, so I actually asked
> that
> >>>>> inside of the first email.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On the other side, I do think we should make WS requests approval
> much
> >>>>> quicker, as in the most of the new requests, it will be used for
> language
> >>>>> preservation.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Gerard, may you explain what do you think with "It is the wrong
> >>>>> mailinglist for that." What's the right method to discuss this in
> your
> >>>>> opinion?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> Langcom mailing list
> >>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Langcom mailing list
> >>>> [email protected]
> >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Langcom mailing list
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Langcom mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Langcom mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>
> _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
