Yes, let's approve them.
-- Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי http://aharoni.wordpress.com “We're living in pieces, I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore 2015-11-30 16:53 GMT+02:00 Milos Rancic <[email protected]>: > Yes, from "Wikimedia Foundation Language Committee"... My Gmail has > taken this description by default from somebody... > > So, first, MF-Warburg says Georgian Wikisource should go regularly. > > I suggest Neapolitan Wikisource should go fast forward. > > And I suggest we amend the rules which would say something like "After > the first project created, community can get Wikisource at any point > of time." -- or whatever appropriate. > > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Gerard Meijssen > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hoi, > > You are not. My bad, it shows as wikimedia, I thought it was wikimedia-l > > Thanks, > > GerardM > > > > On 30 November 2015 at 15:24, Milos Rancic <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Gerard, we are talking here via the list [email protected]. > Am I > >> missing something? > >> > >> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Gerard Meijssen > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hoi, > >>> The right mailing list is the mailing list of the language committee. > All > >>> its members are subscribed to that one. > >>> Thanks, > >>> GerardM > >>> > >>> On 30 November 2015 at 14:14, Milos Rancic <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 1:08 PM, MF-Warburg <[email protected] > > > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> I don't understand. If ka.ws fulfills the activity requirements, it > can > >>>>> be approved. Did anyone check it already? > >>>> > >>>> No :) I am a bit out of regular LangCom duties, so I actually asked > that > >>>> inside of the first email. > >>>> > >>>> On the other side, I do think we should make WS requests approval much > >>>> quicker, as in the most of the new requests, it will be used for > language > >>>> preservation. > >>>> > >>>> Gerard, may you explain what do you think with "It is the wrong > >>>> mailinglist for that." What's the right method to discuss this in your > >>>> opinion? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> Langcom mailing list > >>>> [email protected] > >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Langcom mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom > >>> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Langcom mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Langcom mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom > > > > _______________________________________________ > Langcom mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >
_______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
